Here is a brief
profile of how I see the author of the Voynich manuscript in my working
hypothesis. Such a profile is, of course, just a thought experiment,
something to give it shape, but at this stage I can hazard a guess:
*The
Voynich manuscript is by (a project of) an elder (male) figure of the Ladin tradition
who was in direct contact with (liaison) and instructed by Nicholas of
Cusa during the period when Nicholas was bishop.
*He was a
representative of the Ladin people, of the Ladin nobility, who acted as
go-betweens twixt the (illiterate and poor) Ladin and the church and
secular authorities.
*This Ladin elder was (partially) literate (only some Latin) and as well as Ladin spoke German.
*His culture was aristocratic. He is associated with nobility and the secular authorities.
*He was a man of some
means, or in the employ of someone of means. He was able to marshal the
resources to have a manuscript produced.
*He was trained in the ancient Ladin herbal tradition and had an
overview of its forms in the various Ladin alpine communities, along
with its folklore. This knowledge was necessarily in the Ladin language.
*He was, however, also apprised of “modern science” – new
learning – and actively attempted to keep his folk tradition up with the
times. These are matters in which he was instructed by Nicholas.
*That is, he was a proto-Paracelsean figure: he grew up with a folk alpine herbal
tradition and wanted to inform it and fortify it with the new learning.
*He was a lay Christian and acts as a religious guide or model
to his people. He is aware that the rustic tradition of his people is
pre-Christian. He is keen to understand his (pagan) tradition in
Christian terms. These are matters in which he was instructed by
Nicholas.
*He was likely a resident of Val Badia. Specifically, he was
resident at Ćiastel de Tor, Badia castle, also known as San Martino del
Tor, the likely place for the composition of the manuscript.
* * *
Some of the holes in this profile are so glaring you could drive a truck through them, but as I explore the ramifications of my wider hypothesis this is the sort of profile that begins to emerge. Like everything, plausible but unproven. The question is: what sort of dramatis personae fits the scenario?
R. B.
No comments:
Post a Comment