The Journey of [o]

We can read our two keywords, our verbum potentiae, QOKEEDY and CHOLDAIIN, as sequences of glyph transformation. Most notable is the transformation of the glyph [o]. We can read both words as a journey, a story, about the transformation of [o]. 

It is simple to observe, but is important inasmuch as the keywords and their glyphs are based upon a curve-line scheme. The [o] is an important but neglected part of that scheme. 

How it appears in QOKEEDY is this:

1. [q] produces an [o]

2. [k] turns this [o] into a series of c-curves [ee]

In CHOLDAIIN this same movement appears as:

1. [ch] produces an [o]

2. [ld] turns this [o] into an [a]

3. [a] produces a series of backslashes \. 

In QOKEEDY the [q] generates the [o], but the [k] changes the [o] into a series of [e] i.e. c-curves. 

In CHOLDAIIN, the [ch] generates the [o], but the tangle of the two consonants [l] and [d] changes the [o] not into c-curves but into [a] - and the [a] generates a sequence of [i] i.e. backslash glyphs. We can see that it is in fact the [l] that creates the change. In any case, we see the circle [o] transformed into the line [i]. 

Again: in QOKEEDY the [o] becomes c-curves. In CHOLDAIIN the [o] becomes lines. 

In QOKEEDY [q] produces [o] and [k] converts the [o] into [ee].

In CHOLDAIIN [ch] produces [o] and [l] converts the [o] into [a] which produces [ii]. 

We need to see the glyphs as sequential in this way. 

R.B.